This is the second part of my experience sharing about
governance in Canada during an official visit this year. At the outset, a big
thanks for the encouraging feedback to the first article. Those who wish to read the article; you can visit my blog as
well. (The First Part )
In this part, I will be dealing more with governance. So brace yourself for some statistical bombardment.
In this part, I will be dealing more with governance. So brace yourself for some statistical bombardment.
One of the important governance characteristics in Canada is
federalism and relative autonomy of the institutions. This stems necessarily
out of fiscal independence.
We found that that for Toronto
city income from their own savings is more than the grants from Provincial/Federal
government. That’s true financial independence. States and Centre largely
dictate Indian municipal institutions, because they grant substantial funds. For
the municipal bodies in Canada, one-third income comes from Property tax. In
Mumbai, it is less than 10%. It is low in Mumbai due lack of proper records and
valuation. Also to put things in comparative sense, BMC has 10 times more
population to cater to than Toronto. Toronto’s capital budget is whopping $110
Billion, while the budget is only $10 Billion for Mumbai. Development charges,
i.e. appropriated during construction of a private project are coming up as the
new source of revenue in most municipalities in Canada. In India, we need to
provide affordable housing to all. Thus such moves would be unwise.
One notable feature of all the levels of governance in
Canada is the amazing level of self-awareness. They have up to date and precise
database and models to use that data for public policy. The stress is on having
good quality data, which often is collected and/or corroborated by private
entities. In India, quality of data is questionable to say the least. Municipal
data is often old and thus unreliable. Even the critical data regarding IIP and
GDP figures has been doing rounds of controversy lately.
The cities typically adopt 1-year operating budget, 2-year
outlook and 10-year capital budget and plan accordingly. They must balance the
budget i.e. the operating expenditure (like revenue expenditure in India) must
be met through operating income alone. The Municipality can’t borrow for the
same. Also, debt payment is through operating budget. This automatically
ensures zero revenue deficit. And the borrowings are only for capital purposes.
This indeed is a good provision to reduce what economists call Wasteful
expenditure. Municipal bonds are issued and traded at national level. Public
participation is also encouraged in budget process through the town hall
meetings and citywide consultations.
One good part was availability of
skilled manpower even down to municipal levels. The bureaucracy in Canada is
different from India. There is no statutory civil service except Foreign
Service. The hiring policies of government are analogous to the private sector.
Thus there are no “Permanent” bureaucrats sitting over files. That makes the
talent pool dynamic. The mayor can hire and fire anyone needed without
prolonged legal proceedings. This means the employees have to work hard to keep
their jobs and stay accountable to people (!) India has huge bureaucratic setup
(to which I belong!). But Canada has more public service officer per thousand’
population than India does. So it’s not the size, but the attitude. The ‘Red
Tape’ bureaucratic mentality in India is the obstacle to service delivery and
development.
Western nations developed their
governments on the liberal philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Thus
the State is considered to be a necessary evil. Thus it needs to be kept
minimal. In economic arena, it is believed that money is better off with people
than government. The executive really has to fight tooth and nail to get money
sanctioned from legislature. And the legislators are reluctant to increase any
tax. Despite this, average family in Ontario pays around $40,000 in taxes. (In
rupees, that comes to 20 Lakh!). Half of it goes to the federal level, around
35% at the provincial level and remaining at the municipal levels. The tax
burden eats up almost half the family income; still people are willing to pay
taxes because they can see their tax dollars being put to good use.
As pointed out in last article, focus of governance in
Canada is more on quality and efficient service delivery. They go extra mile to
make sure it happens. Construction work on road will have warning boards 10
miles before the actual site. The workers will repeatedly apologize for any
inconvenience caused due to them. While the article was being published, Indian
railways changed the pricing for Premium category towards the ‘Congestion
pricing’ model. The decision was criticized as ‘against poor’. In Canada, user
fee automatically gets inflation adjusted. It’s a routine matter and not a
policy decision.
Canadian or rather American lifestyle is of exuberance.
Use-and –throw-shopping styles generate excessive amount of garbage. But we
never came across one place in Toronto that was dirty and stinky. The
municipalities spend more than a third of their capital budget on solid waste
management.
Another important aspect in municipal and presumably
national governance too, is asset management. There is dedicated depreciation
expenditure kept aside. The philosophy is to maintain the asset regularly,
spending sufficiently high to extend its lifecycle considerably. Municipalities
have to design asset management plans and set aside funds for that.
Western economies take urbanization very seriously and focus
on urban governance. The idea that every city has its own soul is always kept
in mind while planning. Thus fiscal prudence doesn’t come in way of cherishing
beauty. There are curious depictions of human brain around the Toronto City
hall.
We had a chance to meet the Member of Provincial Parliament
(like State Legislature) of Ontario, Mr. Vick Dhillon. As the name suggests,
he’s of Indian descent, migrated to Canada as a kid with parents and joined
politics after student life. He was visibly proud of being a Canadian now. His
experiences of working with community, helping Indian community assimilate in
mainstream are noteworthy. The Canadian PM Justin Trudeau was famously quoted
saying that he has more ‘Sikhs’ in
his cabinet than his Indian counterpart! It shows the multiculturalism of
Canada reflecting in its Polity.
An important aspect of governance in Canada is the
importance of traditions and norms. In democracies, the rules and regulations
are necessary to ensure fair and balance procedure. But the governance runs on
the lines norms more than the procedures. GST bill was passed in Indian
Parliament in the last session. There were many backchannel discussions,
negotiations between ruling and opposition parties. Eventually Govt. was able
to bring everyone board. These informal devices are much more established in
Canada. The political parties have Provincial and Federal units, which do not
need to have exact policy positions. They can and do differ on various matters.
Such differences are resolved largely amicably. In some of the provinces, there
are Regional Councils that are made up of several municipalities together. Ex:
York Region Council. That’s an additional layer, additional bureaucracy and
naturally additional areas of conflicts. But the impression we gathered showed
to amicable resolutions through the norms.
Just like any other societies, Canada also faces problems of
bad governance and malpractices. The legends of Toronto Mayor Rob Ford are too popular
to be repeated here. (Those who don’t know, Google him along with John Stewart).
The audit of Pan Am games held this year showed that expenditure had overshot
the sanctioned amount by whopping $342 Million. The problems exist, just the
magnitude and aftermath differs.
Being a vibrant democracy Canadians debate just like us. I
saw the debate on changing the main fighter plane for Canadian Air Force. We
also saw a protest in Montreal. Frankly, there were more police than
protestors. Protestors were college students and they were behaving as if it’s
a picnic.
Canadians seemed genuinely worried about a particular
Presidential candidate in their southern neighbor. But they aren’t planning to
construct a wall (As of now!) Canada has been wholeheartedly welcoming the
refugees and from Syria too. It is easy to talk big. It was particularly heart
warming to see different Municipalities and Provinces actually incorporating
the needs of the migrants and keeping resources aside for them. They are coming
up with ideas to bring the migrants to mainstream society and economy!
A beautiful example of cooperation among citizens is the
underground pedestrian walkway in Toronto. The skyscrapers in busy Downtown
area had their own undergrounds, which later were connected to each other. It
serves an important purpose in winter when temperature outside drops to
negative. The PATH as it is called connects 25 buildings, spans more than 30Kms
and has whole array of shops from high-end suiting to barbers. They open at
office time and close in the evening. So an executive working to meet deadline
doesn’t even need to see the sunlight as long he/she wishes.
To sum it up, we have lot many things to learn from Canada
ranging from solid waste handling to Asset management. The visit was indeed an
eye opener in many perspectives. A significant part of our training was to
learn about the Accrual Accounting in place of Cash Based Accounting. I haven’t
talked about that here because it is very much technical and I wasn’t sure reader
would be much interested in it.
In the last and concluding part, I’ll discuss my
observations about the people, lifestyle and culture. See you here in next blog post!